The McCloud judgement declared that the transition of public sector pensions introduced in 2015 was illegal. This explains the relevance to the Teachers’ Pension schemes.
A budget planner that looks at ‘front-running’ a SIPP, or AVC, before taking your pension.
By using the tax-relief and your personal allowance this sheet can help you see what the effects are on your finances of taking the Teacher’s pension later than 55 and instead using a private pension to plug the gap between 55 and when you are ready to take it.
Had a quick run through and there’s only one difference relevant to teachers from the proposed consultation that I have found.
A.45: Regarding the early-buy-out flexibility. It had been proposed that it just be cancelled with the purchase costs being returned to members, minus tax. The suggestion now is that may be unfair and so more discussions about possible alternatives will take place. i.e. to give members a choice to have a refund (less tax), or convert to another pension element such as ‘additional pension’.
My other notes:
The word “generous” is used extensively in the report, feeding in to a narrative that is often used to attack this aspect of teacher’s pay and conditions. It may be another story but it just grates…that and the references to how the “burden” of paying falls on the ‘taxpayer’ – of course it does, unless you expect people to work for nothing.
A lot of references to tax differences are, in the main, irrelevant to teachers because the levels of contributions taken from teachers was the same no matter which scheme they were/are in.
The mechanism for allowing members to choose must be in place by 1 October 2023 but schemes could do it sooner. The TP scheme I believe to be a simpler conversion than other public sector schemes so could well be one to do it sooner. The annual statement will include details on what benefits would be paid under each choice.
At the point of choice any back-dated amounts would be paid as a lump sum and be taxed on the day they are paid…however, if this means it would involve paying a higher tax rate than would have been the case had they been paid previously then members can apply to HMRC to have the tax calculated as such. This seems reasonable but does put an emphasis on the teacher checking whether this has happened and then having to take action rather than it being resolved automatically. It would, imo, be a small number of cases where the difference would raise a pension into the higher tax band, currently £50,000…there may be more who have pensions below the minimum level though, currently £12,500, who may also need to do this.
The main point is about ‘when’ to make a choice. This is at the time benefits are applied for so at such time the values of each choice will be known and members will not have to guess which would be the best for them.
One possible contentious phrasing relates to the qualifying break. There is a difference of 1 day in the scheme and the proposal. The scheme is that a break of more than 5 years breaks the link between schemes whereas the proposal states “less than 5 years”. An exact break of 5 years therefore could be construed differently. Clarification will be needed on this and I have written to the Treasury to raise this..
Contingent decisions. Members who made decisions based on the introduction of the Career Average scheme and who now regret it can make a claim to revisit that decision and subsequent consequences. However, the onus will be on the member to prove their decision was so influenced and any restitution would include their having to pay any missing contributions…this also has implications for the employer who would also have to pay the related contributions for that member (i.e. the 23% employer contribution, or whatever rate was in effect at that time). Plus interest.
I threw away £8,000 and to make it worse, continue to throw another £2,000 away every year. Learn how to use a little known rule to protect your pension.
Service to break 6 years, service after break 7 years.
Salary at break: £40,000.
Salary at end: £32,000.
End is LOWER than Break = Restricted
1) Break calculation: 6 years / 80 x £40,000 = £3,000 (then inflation is added, say 7 years @2%=~15%) £3,000 + 15% = £3,450.
2) End calculation: 13 years / 80 x £32,000 = £5,200
The best of these is £5,200, so that is what is received.
Service to break 6 years, service after break 7 years.
Salary at break: £40,000.
Salary at end: £44,000.
End is HIGHER than Break = Unrestricted
1) Break calculation: 13 years / 80 x £40,000 = £6,500 (then inflation is added, say 7 years @2%=~15%) £6,500 + 15% = £7,475.
2) End calculation: 13 years / 80 x £44,000 = £7,150
The best of these is £7,475, so that is what is received.
Teachers Pensions Refusing Hypothetical Calculations
The hypothetical calculation is made every time you have a break in service and with teacher’s pay failing to keep pace with inflation for more than 10 years – and likely not to do so for quite a few more, it can easily mean that you will get a HIGHER pension than the one shown on your benefit statement. The problem is that TPS routinely REFUSE to tell you how much this calculation would give you.
One teacher I’ve been chatting with recently finally managed to get a successful conclusion by submitting a formal complaint. This is a paraphrased account of what happened:
Teacher to TPS: Please could you confirm what my pension will be based on the break in service I had in 2010
TPS to Teacher: Thank you for your secure message. I should explain that we do not provide hypothetical estimates of benefits. These calculations are only performed at retirement when a completed application for benefits has been received. I am sorry for any inconvenience this causes.
Teacher to TPS: Via complaint form
- Nature: “How benefits are calculated”
- Reason for complaint: “Failure to provide me with the hypothetical calculation of benefits accrued to my leaving pensionable employment in 2020 based on the break in service I had in 2010”
- Details of complaint: “See previous secured messages requesting same.”
- How to put right: “For TPS to provide the calculation of benefits accrued to September 2020 based on the hypothetical calculation created by my break in service in 2010.”
TPS to Teacher: Within the week a statement detailing the hypothetical calculation was provided for the teacher. The amount from this calculation was in the region of 10% higher than that he had been given previously
Could you be owed hundreds of pounds?
If you bought additional pension with a lump sum, quite possibly.
HMRC are not used to dealing with pension schemes that are NOT set up for automatic tax relief.
The relevant HMRC manual page to quote if the first person you talk to doesn’t understand this fully is the 3rd bullet point on this page:
- where a member makes gross contributions to a registered pension scheme, they can make a claim to HMRC to obtain the tax relief on the contribution. The amount of the contribution is then relieved by being deducted from the member’s total income for the tax year in which the payment is made. The deduction will be shown on the member’s Self-Assessment to give them the correct amount of tax relief. Further information on claims is at PTM044240.
Maximum Per Year £40k
“£40,000 – you must be JOKING…no way am I putting that much into my pension.” You may be shocked!
A teacher’s contribution to their pension is around 10% (twice the normal private pension rate)..so somewhere in the range £3k to £5k per year for a classroom teacher.
Employers have to also put in 23.6% (that’s nearly SIX times the minimum private pension scheme employer’s have to pay).
In addition, defined benefit schemes, such as the TPS have their ‘value’ calculated differently, so you may be surprised at just how much of your £40k Annual Allowance you have used.
Not convinced you should take the pension at 55?
There are other options that will allow you to delay opening your teacher’s pension pot.
Pensions are a fraction of your salary. (80th, 60th, 57th etc) so does taking a pension mean having to watch every penny…it’s not as big a cut as you may think.